.
Feedback

eBay Tuesday: Hopson Boiler

New London industry had a well-known Hamilton Street foundry

For several decades, if a New Londoner felt like having a boiler not only installed by a local company but built by one, they had an option in the Hopson & Chapin Manufacturing Company.

The company was one of several businesses in the city's bustling late 19th century industrial sector. This week's selected item, offered by user Don Ulrich, is an early Kodak photograph of a "Hopson Boiler." The sleek boiler takes up a corner of a room, with ornate writing identifying the type and the company. Ulrich's description estimates that the photo is from around 1890 to 1900, and is an example of the old practice of mailing in one's camera to Kodak so the company could develop and mount the photos, then send them back along with the camera and newly loaded film.

An informational packet on the boiler and the company appears in an online archive, with schematics for the Hopson Boiler and the recommendation that it be used for "medium to large plants." The photo was apparently taken before the recommended brick or portable surface was added to the sides of the boiler.

The Hopsin & Chapin company was established in 1885 on Hamilton Street. Its main focus was on the planning and installation of heating devices, including steam and hot water boilers. Hopson & Chapin later expanded into casting work, including engine cylinders. By 1906, they were advertising in the magazine Motor Boat, promoting the attention given to the iron as well as a pattern room that could be used for quick alterations to designs.

"The Hopson & Chapin Co. have a force of men specially fitted and trained for work and absolutely limit themselves to an amount of work that can receive thorough attention and supervision, hence there is no disappointment or delay in dealing with them," the advertisement reads.

In 1913, a brief article in the Boston Evening Transcript said the Hopson & Chapin plant would close at the end of June and that there were worries that the company would go out of business. The fears seemed to be unfounded. Three years later, the company's advertisements maintained that it was still in the heating business, with vacuum cleaning equipment for sale as well. In fact, the company would apparently have a presence in New London until the dissolution of the corporation in 1970.

The Hopson & Chapin factory building still survives today. It is the long building with the rounded roof at 69 Hamilton Street, located adjacent to the railroad tracks on property that most recently held the Miner & Alexander lumberyard. An effort to have the building placed on the State Register of Historic Places in order to save it from potential demolition was successful, but the site is still on the Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation's list of threatened buildings.

The photo is three and seven-eighths inches by three and a half inches on a five and a quarter inch by four and a quarter inch cardboard mount. There are some surface scuffs but overall it is in good condition. The starting bid is $6.95, and the auction ends at about 10:49 a.m. EST on Wednesday.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Doc Halliday May 19, 2013 at 08:23 am
Should the general public be required to support the retirement of our elected/hired governmentRead More officials? Should those retirement checks be based on base salary and not base salary plus overtime/extra pay/bonuses etc? Should ALL government officials be on a 401 system instead of a government (public supported) retirement system? ie: government official retires at 95% pay, in a few years with cost of living increases that official is making more in retirement than when working. The public cannot afford to continue such high retirements. Social Security is being tapped by government officials to pay OTHER items rather than for what it was intended and future retirees who contributed to SS may be left out.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.
William Desmond May 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm
I must say this has created quite a stir!
Luis Smart May 14, 2013 at 07:04 am
I agree Richard argyle sweaters would have really made it. It is really sad Michael Passero has goneRead More to the dark side and has aligned himself with the administration rather than the people of the city. The one time high vote getter will be all done in November.
Richard Cranium May 13, 2013 at 10:26 pm
I think it is pretty funny although they should be wearing argyle vest sweaters!