.
Feedback

eBay Tuesday: USS Bonefish Naval Cover

Communication commemorates the launching of a submarine during World War II

This week's item captures a moment in naval and local history and is all the more poignant given the fate of the vessel it features.

The naval cover - which seller mayfair99 describes as an envelope posted on board a Navy vessel - is postmarked in the evening of March 7, 1943. The recipient was one James Jeffery at the Harkness estate in Waterford. The cover includes an illustration of an eagle carrying a horseshoe, through which a submarine is churning. The picture is captioned, "U.S. Submarine Bonefish, launched by the Electric Boat Company, Groton, Conn."

The submarine was, in fact, launched the very day this envelope was sent. The keel of the Bonefish was laid down in June of 1942. The launch earned a quick blurb about the sponsor and expected commander. The vessel was commissioned for service on May 31, 1943.

New London has an admittedly tangential relationship to this item, especially since this envelope leapfrogged the city on its way to Waterford. But since New London was awfully generous in donating money toward the establishment of a naval base on the Thames River and putting up submariners in town, the place still bears the name Sub Base New London. That might be why the cruise of the Bonefish to the Pacific was recorded as starting in New London and ending in Brisbane, Australia.

The Bonefish completed a total of eight patrols. There are varying statistics as to the losses she inflicted on Japanese shipping, but this site puts the number at 31 sunk and seven damaged, mostly against the merchant fleet. On May 28, 1945, the Bonefish and two other submarines departed Guam. Bonefish rendezvoused with the submarine Tunny on the morning of June 18, set out for a submerged daytime patrol, and was never seen again.

Postwar records suggest that a Japanese depth charge attack destroyed the Bonefish. She had 85 officers and men on board at the time.

Information on James Jeffery is more difficult to track down, although the Harkness estate is more well-known. According to the state website, millionaire and philanthropist Edward S. Harkness purchased the mansion in 1907. Seven years after this naval cover was sent to the estate, the mansion and its surrounding property were bequeathed to the state; they have been part of the Connecticut state park system since 1952.

The naval cover has an $8 starting bid and free shipping. The auction ends at about 9:45 a.m. on Thursday.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 10:01 am
Bottom line - A dumb decision by a public servant. If he was going to wear a shirt whose humor wasRead More so eccentric that it needed wide explanation, he should have avoided the urge to take a picture AND post it on Facebook! DUMB!
Mario de Lucia May 22, 2013 at 07:52 pm
And what I meant by that comment that I don't think this whole thing has anything to do withRead More t-shirt , it's just a shutout to the Mayer and what he is bringing to the table .
Mario de Lucia May 22, 2013 at 07:50 pm
We are young we like change and we like a good laugh that's all the t- shirt is ,
--Robert May 23, 2013 at 03:15 am
Pathetic that anyone would post this as a legit news story, more so that it seems a big corporationRead More is behind these ads.
Jason Morris May 22, 2013 at 01:30 pm
Jessica's previous two posts in other city's patch pages, with the exact same title (just schoolRead More district name changed) have been moderated/deleted. Recommend this corporate advertisement to get the same fate. The concerns are true, but it's an ad nontheless.
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 09:59 am
Bottom line - A dumb decision by a public servant. If he was going to wear a shirt whose humor wasRead More so eccentric that it needed wide explanation, he should have avoided the urge to take a picture AND post it on Facebook! DUMB!
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 09:57 am
@Josh: Too much tolerance is also a slippery slope. Like it or not, Zak is a public servant, whichRead More makes him automatically subject to scrutiny of his actions by the public. We can and should speak out when our public servants (elected or graciously appointed in Zak's case) - ESPECIALLLY ones that are supposed to be emissaries to the Capitol - engage in behavior that could cast a bad light on our community. Would you be ok with Obama wearing a shirt that says "America hates you"?
Joshua Pendleton May 22, 2013 at 06:44 pm
Love the shirt or hate it, it is Zacs right to wear what he wants, when he wants to. Democracy isRead More founded on tolerance. This tolerance includes public officials hanging out in their back yard. Intolerance of things of this nature is a slippery slope.
Felicia Hendersen May 21, 2013 at 07:52 am
OMG this is too funny. Nice comparison.
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 03:40 pm
I would say that the Collective Bargaining Agreement would have to be looked at for his Union.Read More Mr. Hathaway is not in Local 1378. He is MEU. I would say, that this is an interesting question for our members. Local 1378's CBA does not go into this language, however it does state that prior to reorganization, the union must be notified to bargain the impacts (not exact language). This is not to say that the union has final say, or say at all as to how the administration shall operate, but the impact to the employees is what matters as well as the position in general. I will look into this language in reference to the Charter and forward it to the MEU as well. Thank you.
Kathleen Mitchell May 22, 2013 at 03:17 pm
The following is from NL's Charter, Sec 46. Does it mean that Bill Hathaway would be entitled to aRead More public hearing? "...Any officer or employee so removed, suspended, laid off or reduced in grade shall, if he so request, be furnished with a written statement of the reason therefor, be allowed a reasonable time for answering such reasons in writing and be given a public hearing by the officer making such removal, suspension, lay-off or reduction in grade, before the order therefor shall be made final..."
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 10:37 am
I have not seen any details other than word of mouth at this time in reference to more being addedRead More to the pension plan after two years. I would not be surprised. This would be another instance in which the charter was violated and would have to be mentioned to the Admin. Committee. I would be willing to gamble that they were put into the employee pension plan as well.
Alphonse DeLachance May 21, 2013 at 08:30 am
I cannot believe that they lied! Who could have seen this coming.