.
Feedback

The Other Moving "Stars"

While you're out stargazing, try out another night sky hobby!

This week I stray slightly from the topic of Astronomy to discuss another very commonly observed phenomena in the night sky.  If you venture outside to look at the stars in any evening over the next few months, as you look into the great vault of darkness overhead you are sure to see not only stars, but moving lights in the sky.  Nearly all of the moving lights in the night sky are man-made. 

If you had any luck this past weekend observing the Perseids, you now know what meteors look like.  Unfortunately, Saturday night we had heavy clouds over most of Connecticut at the peak of the shower (and yes, I checked at 10, 12, 2 and 3 just to be sure - I'm kind of hooked on this meteor shower). As I write this on Sunday night, I'm outside again (loving my Android tablet) with much better prospects of picking up some late Perseids - clear skies all around.

The best time to look for satellites is from 1 to 3 hours after sunset (or before sunrise, but even I won't be getting up to see satellites at those hours).  At those times, satellites traversing the sky above us are still lit by the sun, which has sunk beneath our horizon here on Earth, but is still above the horizon in orbit overhead.  I've found that August through October is prime satellite hunting season, mostly because darkness comes at a convenient time, and it isn't too cold out to sit still for a few minutes.

A satellite will look like a drifting star, moving much slower than a meteor.  The most common moving lights, at least where I'm located near a small airport, are airplanes.  A high-flying airplane can be easily mistaken as a satellite in your first attempt at observing.  But a satellite will never show a colored light, and will never blink like the collision avoidance strobe lights that are on every airplane. 

Satellites are seen by reflecting sunlight off their surfaces, and in particular their solar panels. The brightness of the satellite will change gradually, as the surface reflecting light in your direction drifts out of pointing toward you. The brightest satellites rival the brightest stars, while the average satellite may be as bright as a common star.  If you can see more than a few stars from where you are located, you have an excellent chance of seeing satellites. 

If you go out at 9 or so in August through October, and look up for at least 15 minutes, you are sure to catch one or more satellites.  During these time periods there are dozens of satellites passing overhead. The human eye is very good at recognizing objects in motion - in fact, I've often seen satellites that would have been too dim for me to notice had they not been moving. 

When you sight a satellite, note the time and the direction it was moving.  When you are done observing, go to www.heavens-above.com and you can enjoy the second part of the hobby of satellite observing - you can identify what you saw.

You enter your location (town name is fine, latitude and longitude is better) and you can easily get a list of everything that passed overhead in the past 48 hours. The direction and altitude (degrees above the horizon) of each satellite is listed, with the time. The names listed are mostly catalog names, but with a link that provides more information. You can also look ahead in time to see what will be coming in the next 48 hours.

The skill of picking out satellites against a starry sky is not hard to learn - I find that all of my students are able to do this within the first couple nights of class, and in fact to keep them entertained while waiting for their turn at the telescope, I sometimes hand out a list of the satellites that we are expecting to see that night.  My 4 year old son is very adept at finding satellites, when he is paying attention. 

Generally speaking, satellites traveling west to east are utility satellites - communications, weather observatories, or small experiments. Satellites traveling north to south or south to north are passing over most of the Earth's surface - these are mapping satellites, usually for military purposes. Most of those that we see here in the US are of Chinese or Russian origin. 

By far, the most commonly observed satellites are not satellites themselves, but the upper stages of the rockets that launched the satellites.  These are more visible than the actual satellites simply because they are physically larger. 

There are currently about 2500 satellites orbiting Earth, several hundred of which remain functional.  There are roughly 1400 Soviet/Russian vehicles and 1000 American spacecraft, and several other countries with a handful.  There are about as many spent stages orbiting as well.

Back on Sunday night, when I started writing this entry, my final "score" was 10 Perseid meteors, and 9 satellites sighted in about 75 minutes.  (And about 30 planes...).

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Felicia Hendersen May 21, 2013 at 07:52 am
OMG this is too funny. Nice comparison.
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?