.
Feedback

Learning to See the Sky at Night: User's Manual For Your Eyes

Your eyes are the most powerful astronomical instruments you will ever own. Learn how to use them!

If I’ve tempted you into trying to find objects in the night sky, you may have already discovered that there are challenges in store for the casual astronomical observer. On top of the difficulty of just finding your way around the night sky as the visible constellations change their locations every hour as the Earth rotates, and every month as the Earth makes it way around its orbit, there is the additional challenge of learning how to use the instruments of astronomy. And the most fundamental instrument you will use is the most sophisticated of all, and does not come with a user’s manual — your eyes.

Using your eyes to observe astronomical objects is an acquired skill, requiring both knowledge of how the eye works, and training. In my classes, I spend a good deal of time training the students how to see what I am showing them. By the end of the course they can see galaxies that were completely invisible to them in our first observations. Whether you are just staring directly at the night sky, or looking through the largest of telescopes, your success in personally experiencing the wonders of the night sky comes down to how well you make use of your vision. 

Let’s start with a quick overview of how your eye works. (I’ll warn you now that I am not an ophthalmologist, so this description may not be medically accurate — I’m going for functional accuracy here.) Light enters your eye through the pupil – a physical hole at the outermost edge of each eye. The light then passes through a lens of gelatinous material, and is focused down onto your retina — an array of light-sensitive cells, curved around the back interior of your eyeball. You can think of the retina as the sensor of a digital camera. 

The human eye is in fact an astoundingly versatile instrument. The ratio of the brightest scene that can be viewed, to the faintest objects that can be detected, is about a billion to one. (No camera can come close to accomplishing this). In a famous set of experiments performed in the 1940s, it was determined that a visual experience occurs when only 9 photons reach the retina at the same instant! To allow for such a wide range of sensitivity, the retina must be protected against overexposure to bright scenes. This is accomplished by a combination of chemical sensitivities in the retina itself (think ISO setting on the camera), and with the iris, which surrounds the pupil and controls the amount of light that enters the eye (think aperture setting). 

In astronomy, we are usually interested in viewing dim objects. To get the best views, we need to ensure that our irises are opened as far as they will go, and that our retinas are maximally adapted to darkness. Since eyes are damaged by bright light, but not by dim light, our eyes adapt very rapidly to bright lights — shutting down the retina sensitivity and slamming the iris down to 1-2 millimeters in diameter in a small fraction of a second — but much more slowly to dim light.  The iris will open to its maximum size in about 10-15 minutes, and the chemical changes in the retina will take up to 30 minutes to complete. Both of these times grow longer with age.

To observe dim objects in the night sky, we need to eliminate as much of the other light in our surroundings as possible. Turn off all of the lights in your control, and try hard not to look at other lights around you. If a source of light is needed, deep red light has the least effect on dark adaptation — a flashlight covered with red crepe paper, or with almost dead batteries is ideal. Remember that you will lose your night vision in a second, and it will take at least 10 minutes to get it back again! I know astronomy enthusiasts who observe surrounded by partitions, or even sport a pirate patch over the eye they put to the telescope. 

So let’s say you’ve managed to stay away from lights for a good 10 minutes, you’ve found the constellation you need to find, and you are searching for that dim object Aaron said you could find between this and that star.  The next trick is to not look directly at the object! 

In your retina, there are two kinds of light-receptive cells. Cones convert light into the sensation of color, while rods operate strictly in shades of gray. The cones are less sensitive to light than the rods — which is why you see little or no color at night. However, near the center of the retina, where your center of vision is focused, cones far outnumber rods, and therefore at the center of your vision you are less able to see the dimmest of objects.  Astronomers become trained in using “averted vision” to find the hardest objects — looking and studying the objects out of the corner of their eyes.

Before I wrap up this lesson in seeing, I want to discuss the purpose of binoculars and telescopes in astronomy. Many think of these instruments as being great magnifiers, bringing objects “closer” to use to give us clearer views of the heavenly bodies. In fact, the goal of any astronomical instrument is to stuff as many photons from the object being observed through the pupil of your eye as possible. This is done by creating a bigger pupil, and focusing the light coming through that larger pupil into a cone that passes through the pupil of your eye. 

So it is the diameter of the telescope or binocular that matters — not its magnifying power. In fact, in many cases the magnification is more a hassle than a desire, because stars will forever appear as points of light no matter how magnified the image becomes, but the higher the magnification the less area of the sky you can see in one image.

A typical pair of binoculars has a 50mm diameter lens. The human eye, when the iris is maximally open, has a diameter of about 5mm (a little bigger for children).  Since the area of the hole through which the light passes is what matters, the 50mm diameter binoculars will bring about 100 times more light to your retina than your naked eye. You will be able to see objects about 100 times dimmer through a $20 pair of binoculars. You may find it is well worth the investment!

Thanks for reading, and I hope to see some of you this fall in our upcoming classes — I still have several spots available if you wish to join us! Check it out at www.turnerclasses.com.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.
William Desmond May 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm
I must say this has created quite a stir!
Luis Smart May 14, 2013 at 07:04 am
I agree Richard argyle sweaters would have really made it. It is really sad Michael Passero has goneRead More to the dark side and has aligned himself with the administration rather than the people of the city. The one time high vote getter will be all done in November.
Richard Cranium May 13, 2013 at 10:26 pm
I think it is pretty funny although they should be wearing argyle vest sweaters!