.
Feedback

A Tale of Two Planets: Uranus and Neptune

Take the opportunity to re-discover our Solar System's outermost planets

As the students in my current astronomy class know, this fall is a particularly tough time for those interested in observing the planets of our solar system.  Saturn and Mercury lie close to the Sun in the late afternoon sky, all setting less than an hour after sunset.  Mars is low in the western sky at sunset, difficult to see between the trees, and blurred by the thicker layer of atmosphere in the direction of the horizon.  Jupiter rises at 9:30, but isn't high enough in the sky for observing until nearly midnight.  Venus rises at the inconvenient hour of 3am, and isn't easily observed until about 5. 

But there are two planets that are high in the evening sky, and can be observed in small telescopes, or even binoculars.  Uranus and Neptune are admittedly not much to look at from your backyard, but perhaps after knowing the stories of their discovery, you may be tempted to go on a  personal quest to see the most distant planets of the Sun with your own eyes. This week I relate the first of these stories.

The pre-scientific civilizations knew only of 5 "wandering stars". Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn were known to be points of light which, unlike the rest of the stars, changed their position in the sky over periods ranging from days to months.  Since the time of ancient Greece, for over 2000 years, it was generally thought that the planets, along with the Sun and Moon and stars,  orbited a motionless Earth once each day.  The drift of the planets among the stars was explained by an increasingly complicated set of decentered circular orbits, describing motions quite like the Spirograph toys which you may recall from childhood.

It was only in the 1500's that planetary astronomy resumed a scientific advancement.  In the early part of that century, Nicholas Copernicus formulated a simpler description for the motion of the planets by assuming that they and Earth orbited the Sun in circular orbits.  His theory was not published until his death, mostly for concern over religious objections.  It was not until the first years of the next century that Johannes Kepler determined a more complete description of planetary motion, but this is a story to be told some other time...

The nature of the wandering stars was not revealed until the invention of the telescope in the early 1600's, and the first use of a telescope to observe the planets Jupiter and Saturn by Galileo in 1610.  Galileo was the first to see the planets as spheres very unlike stars, which under the highest levels of magnification always appear as points of light (due to their immense distance from Earth). 

The advancement of astronomy after Galileo was continual, with increasingly detailed catalogs of stars and other celestial objects being created throughout the later 1600's through the 1800's.  The telescope was dramatically improved after Newton invented an all-mirror telescope in 1668, and both the number of telescopes and their size and quality advanced rapidly in the 1700's.

Sir William Herschel was one of the early great telescopic observers, and manufactured over 400 telescopes of various sizes in his lifetime.  His largest was a 49" diameter Newtonian reflector, which rapidly proved impractical to use because of its stupendous size (over 40 feet in length). Herschel, assisted by his sister Caroline,  performed a grand survey of the heavens starting in the 1770's, building catalogs of double stars and nebulae that are still consulted today by amateurs and professional astronomers alike.

It was during his survey of double stars that on the night of March 13, 1781 that Herschel observed a pale white disk at a position not matching any known fixed star in the constellation Taurus.  During this period in the history of astronomy, with the steady improvement in telescopes, the discovery of comets months before they became bright objects in the night sky was becoming an exciting possibility.  Herschel was convinced that he had discovered such an object after returning the next night to the same area of the sky and confirming that the object he observed the previous night had moved slightly relative to the surrounding stars. 

After making several more careful observations of the pale disk, recording the exact motion of this body through the background of stars, it became possible to roughly estimate the orbit of the object and begin to predict its future motion.  Herschel worked out the preliminary orbit estimate, finding that newly discovered object was incredibly over 1.5 billion miles from the Sun - nearly twice the distance of Saturn, the farthest known planet in the Solar System.  To be at this immense distance, and yet easily observed by Herschel through even small telescopes, it was quickly understood that this object was far larger than any comet, and indeed much larger than the Earth. 

Herschel named the object Georgium Sidus (George's Star) after the reigning king of England, George the Third (the same king of early American history infamy).  Although this royal flattery did help Herschel become appointed the "King's Astronomer", the name was not well received outside England, where it was widely referred to as Herschel's Star.

However, it was not yet proven that Herschel's Star was a planet.  At its huge distance from Earth, the new object changed position in the sky so gradually that an exact orbit was very difficult to calculate, and the possibility of error was large.  The Russian mathematician Anders Lexell, a master of the field of mathematics now known as celestial mechanics, became interested in this problem, and worked for several months using the accumulation of observations being made throughout Europe.  Despite his efforts, he was unable to determine if the object was orbiting in a closed elliptical path, or in an open parabolic orbit typical of comets. 

Finally, Lexell referred back to previous sightings of an object of similar brightness made in back in 1759, and also not matching any known star position, by the astronomer Christian Mayer.  Conjecturing that these observations, made in the nearby constellation Pisces, were of the same object seen by Herschel in the constellation Taurus some 22 years later, Lexell recomputed the orbit, finding it to be a nearly circular ellipse, and confirming the object as a very massive planet.

Herschel went on to discover two large moons orbiting the new planet.  European astronomers debated the proper name for the new planet, suggesting both Neptune, to commemorate Britain's recent naval victories, and Uranus, the father of Saturn.  The element uranium, discovered in 1789, was named in support of this choice.  Uranus became the accepted name for Herschel's planet, though it was only in 1850 that the Royal Society of London officially abandoned the name Georgium Sidus.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Matthew Macunus Jr. May 24, 2013 at 01:30 pm
Why is Dr. Fischer even allowed to respond to public comment he is not a member of the board ofRead More education. Read their bylaws and policies. The president Curtin had the right and duty to silence Fischer. He has no standing to speak freely during the meeting. Once the meeting starts he can only speak when the president of the board allows him to speak. Just like anyone else in attendance. Ryan I agree that you should after all the publicity you have received from the ZAK affair give Peg Curtin a $22.00 T-Shirt for free. That price is kind of steep for a tee shirt anyway. Let us all see how generous you can be. Your profit margin must be incredible.
Kathleen Mitchell May 24, 2013 at 01:26 pm
Sue, Damn, that gumbo's good! What else do you have over at your house?
Sue P. May 24, 2013 at 01:24 pm
Oh Lord here we go again. There might be a good old New London fist fight over this one.
Sue P. May 24, 2013 at 12:34 pm
I think that all of you who are asking Zak to resign better take another glance at what you areRead More saying. If Zak did decide to resign who do you think Mr. Mayor himself would put in Zaks place? Think about it, does the name Laura Clueless Natusch come to mind. She has been the all time supporter of Himself and he does owe her something for standing by him in all of the foolishness. Be careful what you wish for. I personally would find that entertaining. Come on seriously that would be a hoot.
The Truth Hurts May 24, 2013 at 12:23 pm
@Joshua: Looks like another mature, insightful and value added comment from a staunch supporter ofRead More Finizio. Par for the course.
Sue P. May 24, 2013 at 11:24 am
I have a great idea, Ryan, maybe you could make Zak a T-shirt that says New London hates Me. IRead More wonder if that would be offensive. As much as we all complain about the administration I would like to point out that there is nothing we can do about it for another 2 and a half years. It is what it is and I think of Zak as the only way to communicate with this administration. It's too bad that Tammy wasn't the one wearing the shirt. Zak works for Daryl Justin Finizio and he is to do what he is told or else. I for one do not want Zak to resign because he is the only one there besides Nate that can tell us what is happening in this city. Don't worry 2 and a half years is not that long and don't forget about this November when we can finally make a change. Stay informed.
Felicia Hendersen May 24, 2013 at 09:11 am
Truth Hurts, that is exactly the reason that Zak needs to step down, dumb youthful urges and notRead More thinking before one acts is not the right mix for someone in the position representing the community. Do the right thing Zak and resign. These things never go away, but you should.
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 10:01 am
Bottom line - A dumb decision by a public servant. If he was going to wear a shirt whose humor wasRead More so eccentric that it needed wide explanation, he should have avoided the urge to take a picture AND post it on Facebook! DUMB!
Mario de Lucia May 22, 2013 at 07:52 pm
And what I meant by that comment that I don't think this whole thing has anything to do withRead More t-shirt , it's just a shutout to the Mayer and what he is bringing to the table .
--Robert May 23, 2013 at 03:15 am
Pathetic that anyone would post this as a legit news story, more so that it seems a big corporationRead More is behind these ads.
Jason Morris May 22, 2013 at 01:30 pm
Jessica's previous two posts in other city's patch pages, with the exact same title (just schoolRead More district name changed) have been moderated/deleted. Recommend this corporate advertisement to get the same fate. The concerns are true, but it's an ad nontheless.
Felicia Hendersen May 24, 2013 at 09:13 am
Barbara, the shirt creator, Zak and the band of mayoral supporters all share the same mind. That isRead More why it is difficult for them to make any good decisions.
Barbara Crocker May 23, 2013 at 07:39 pm
My observance that NL people are not the haters, but the hated, amuses you??? Don't quite get that,Read More but it seems by the post written by the shirt's creator, that you don't get it either...
Marco Frucht May 23, 2013 at 06:43 pm
Barbara, Felicia, you people amuse me! Might I also suggest that this entire issue is being blownRead More way out of proportion?
Felicia Hendersen May 21, 2013 at 07:52 am
OMG this is too funny. Nice comparison.
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 03:40 pm
I would say that the Collective Bargaining Agreement would have to be looked at for his Union.Read More Mr. Hathaway is not in Local 1378. He is MEU. I would say, that this is an interesting question for our members. Local 1378's CBA does not go into this language, however it does state that prior to reorganization, the union must be notified to bargain the impacts (not exact language). This is not to say that the union has final say, or say at all as to how the administration shall operate, but the impact to the employees is what matters as well as the position in general. I will look into this language in reference to the Charter and forward it to the MEU as well. Thank you.
Kathleen Mitchell May 22, 2013 at 03:17 pm
The following is from NL's Charter, Sec 46. Does it mean that Bill Hathaway would be entitled to aRead More public hearing? "...Any officer or employee so removed, suspended, laid off or reduced in grade shall, if he so request, be furnished with a written statement of the reason therefor, be allowed a reasonable time for answering such reasons in writing and be given a public hearing by the officer making such removal, suspension, lay-off or reduction in grade, before the order therefor shall be made final..."
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 10:37 am
I have not seen any details other than word of mouth at this time in reference to more being addedRead More to the pension plan after two years. I would not be surprised. This would be another instance in which the charter was violated and would have to be mentioned to the Admin. Committee. I would be willing to gamble that they were put into the employee pension plan as well.