.
Feedback

A Tale of Two Planets: Uranus and Neptune

Take the opportunity to re-discover our Solar System's outermost planets

As the students in my current astronomy class know, this fall is a particularly tough time for those interested in observing the planets of our solar system.  Saturn and Mercury lie close to the Sun in the late afternoon sky, all setting less than an hour after sunset.  Mars is low in the western sky at sunset, difficult to see between the trees, and blurred by the thicker layer of atmosphere in the direction of the horizon.  Jupiter rises at 9:30, but isn't high enough in the sky for observing until nearly midnight.  Venus rises at the inconvenient hour of 3am, and isn't easily observed until about 5. 

But there are two planets that are high in the evening sky, and can be observed in small telescopes, or even binoculars.  Uranus and Neptune are admittedly not much to look at from your backyard, but perhaps after knowing the stories of their discovery, you may be tempted to go on a  personal quest to see the most distant planets of the Sun with your own eyes. This week I relate the first of these stories.

The pre-scientific civilizations knew only of 5 "wandering stars". Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn were known to be points of light which, unlike the rest of the stars, changed their position in the sky over periods ranging from days to months.  Since the time of ancient Greece, for over 2000 years, it was generally thought that the planets, along with the Sun and Moon and stars,  orbited a motionless Earth once each day.  The drift of the planets among the stars was explained by an increasingly complicated set of decentered circular orbits, describing motions quite like the Spirograph toys which you may recall from childhood.

It was only in the 1500's that planetary astronomy resumed a scientific advancement.  In the early part of that century, Nicholas Copernicus formulated a simpler description for the motion of the planets by assuming that they and Earth orbited the Sun in circular orbits.  His theory was not published until his death, mostly for concern over religious objections.  It was not until the first years of the next century that Johannes Kepler determined a more complete description of planetary motion, but this is a story to be told some other time...

The nature of the wandering stars was not revealed until the invention of the telescope in the early 1600's, and the first use of a telescope to observe the planets Jupiter and Saturn by Galileo in 1610.  Galileo was the first to see the planets as spheres very unlike stars, which under the highest levels of magnification always appear as points of light (due to their immense distance from Earth). 

The advancement of astronomy after Galileo was continual, with increasingly detailed catalogs of stars and other celestial objects being created throughout the later 1600's through the 1800's.  The telescope was dramatically improved after Newton invented an all-mirror telescope in 1668, and both the number of telescopes and their size and quality advanced rapidly in the 1700's.

Sir William Herschel was one of the early great telescopic observers, and manufactured over 400 telescopes of various sizes in his lifetime.  His largest was a 49" diameter Newtonian reflector, which rapidly proved impractical to use because of its stupendous size (over 40 feet in length). Herschel, assisted by his sister Caroline,  performed a grand survey of the heavens starting in the 1770's, building catalogs of double stars and nebulae that are still consulted today by amateurs and professional astronomers alike.

It was during his survey of double stars that on the night of March 13, 1781 that Herschel observed a pale white disk at a position not matching any known fixed star in the constellation Taurus.  During this period in the history of astronomy, with the steady improvement in telescopes, the discovery of comets months before they became bright objects in the night sky was becoming an exciting possibility.  Herschel was convinced that he had discovered such an object after returning the next night to the same area of the sky and confirming that the object he observed the previous night had moved slightly relative to the surrounding stars. 

After making several more careful observations of the pale disk, recording the exact motion of this body through the background of stars, it became possible to roughly estimate the orbit of the object and begin to predict its future motion.  Herschel worked out the preliminary orbit estimate, finding that newly discovered object was incredibly over 1.5 billion miles from the Sun - nearly twice the distance of Saturn, the farthest known planet in the Solar System.  To be at this immense distance, and yet easily observed by Herschel through even small telescopes, it was quickly understood that this object was far larger than any comet, and indeed much larger than the Earth. 

Herschel named the object Georgium Sidus (George's Star) after the reigning king of England, George the Third (the same king of early American history infamy).  Although this royal flattery did help Herschel become appointed the "King's Astronomer", the name was not well received outside England, where it was widely referred to as Herschel's Star.

However, it was not yet proven that Herschel's Star was a planet.  At its huge distance from Earth, the new object changed position in the sky so gradually that an exact orbit was very difficult to calculate, and the possibility of error was large.  The Russian mathematician Anders Lexell, a master of the field of mathematics now known as celestial mechanics, became interested in this problem, and worked for several months using the accumulation of observations being made throughout Europe.  Despite his efforts, he was unable to determine if the object was orbiting in a closed elliptical path, or in an open parabolic orbit typical of comets. 

Finally, Lexell referred back to previous sightings of an object of similar brightness made in back in 1759, and also not matching any known star position, by the astronomer Christian Mayer.  Conjecturing that these observations, made in the nearby constellation Pisces, were of the same object seen by Herschel in the constellation Taurus some 22 years later, Lexell recomputed the orbit, finding it to be a nearly circular ellipse, and confirming the object as a very massive planet.

Herschel went on to discover two large moons orbiting the new planet.  European astronomers debated the proper name for the new planet, suggesting both Neptune, to commemorate Britain's recent naval victories, and Uranus, the father of Saturn.  The element uranium, discovered in 1789, was named in support of this choice.  Uranus became the accepted name for Herschel's planet, though it was only in 1850 that the Royal Society of London officially abandoned the name Georgium Sidus.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mark Felt May 22, 2013 at 03:32 pm
Kathleen, Baby steps, New London is in a bad way and any progress is good no matter what. Hope thatRead More something is being done or getting accomplished is a good thing. Hope ignites the soul. Very much like you ignite things Kathleen.
rob May 22, 2013 at 03:25 pm
Just look the other way again, we did that for the pot issue, we are letting illegals get licensesRead More even though they should not be here, so wear what you want, who cares there's no accountability.
Kathleen Mitchell May 22, 2013 at 03:00 pm
Mark, I disagree with your statement that "We need a modicum of accountability among ourRead More elected and appointed officials." As citizens of this city, we need and deserve more than a modicum of accountability; yet, as the months since this administration has taken office have rolled by, too many of us, including council members, have been willing to let just one more unacceptable thing go by. Zak and his t-shirt are the very least of it and to insist on his resignation over such a silly thing would, I'm afraid, give residents the false impression that they have accomplished something with this administration.
Jason Morris May 22, 2013 at 01:30 pm
Jessica's previous two posts in other city's patch pages, with the exact same title (just schoolRead More district name changed) have been moderated/deleted. Recommend this corporate advertisement to get the same fate. The concerns are true, but it's an ad nontheless.
rob May 22, 2013 at 03:19 pm
Jason, he took an administrative position to represent the City, this means 24 hours a day even ifRead More you don't get paid for it. You must be part of the clan.
Jason Morris May 22, 2013 at 01:21 pm
Ridiculous. How about we pay him for 24hours of 'representing NL' if the disgruntleds want everyRead More city employee to be 'professional' at all times? "we pay your salary, so we get to dictate your entire life...p.s. we hate your boss...wait! correction...we really don't like your boss"
Doc Halliday May 22, 2013 at 12:35 pm
Unprofessional, even in jest, the shirt shows a lack of maturity. If anyone called on me with thatRead More type of shirt, I would refuse to see them. My opinion. Today's youth need to grow up and separate jest from professionalism.
Felicia Hendersen May 21, 2013 at 07:52 am
OMG this is too funny. Nice comparison.
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 03:40 pm
I would say that the Collective Bargaining Agreement would have to be looked at for his Union.Read More Mr. Hathaway is not in Local 1378. He is MEU. I would say, that this is an interesting question for our members. Local 1378's CBA does not go into this language, however it does state that prior to reorganization, the union must be notified to bargain the impacts (not exact language). This is not to say that the union has final say, or say at all as to how the administration shall operate, but the impact to the employees is what matters as well as the position in general. I will look into this language in reference to the Charter and forward it to the MEU as well. Thank you.
Kathleen Mitchell May 22, 2013 at 03:17 pm
The following is from NL's Charter, Sec 46. Does it mean that Bill Hathaway would be entitled to aRead More public hearing? "...Any officer or employee so removed, suspended, laid off or reduced in grade shall, if he so request, be furnished with a written statement of the reason therefor, be allowed a reasonable time for answering such reasons in writing and be given a public hearing by the officer making such removal, suspension, lay-off or reduction in grade, before the order therefor shall be made final..."
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 10:37 am
I have not seen any details other than word of mouth at this time in reference to more being addedRead More to the pension plan after two years. I would not be surprised. This would be another instance in which the charter was violated and would have to be mentioned to the Admin. Committee. I would be willing to gamble that they were put into the employee pension plan as well.
Alphonse DeLachance May 21, 2013 at 08:30 am
I cannot believe that they lied! Who could have seen this coming.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!