.
Feedback

A Tale of Two Planets: Uranus and Neptune

Take the opportunity to re-discover our Solar System's outermost planets

As the students in my current astronomy class know, this fall is a particularly tough time for those interested in observing the planets of our solar system.  Saturn and Mercury lie close to the Sun in the late afternoon sky, all setting less than an hour after sunset.  Mars is low in the western sky at sunset, difficult to see between the trees, and blurred by the thicker layer of atmosphere in the direction of the horizon.  Jupiter rises at 9:30, but isn't high enough in the sky for observing until nearly midnight.  Venus rises at the inconvenient hour of 3am, and isn't easily observed until about 5. 

But there are two planets that are high in the evening sky, and can be observed in small telescopes, or even binoculars.  Uranus and Neptune are admittedly not much to look at from your backyard, but perhaps after knowing the stories of their discovery, you may be tempted to go on a  personal quest to see the most distant planets of the Sun with your own eyes. This week I relate the first of these stories.

The pre-scientific civilizations knew only of 5 "wandering stars". Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn were known to be points of light which, unlike the rest of the stars, changed their position in the sky over periods ranging from days to months.  Since the time of ancient Greece, for over 2000 years, it was generally thought that the planets, along with the Sun and Moon and stars,  orbited a motionless Earth once each day.  The drift of the planets among the stars was explained by an increasingly complicated set of decentered circular orbits, describing motions quite like the Spirograph toys which you may recall from childhood.

It was only in the 1500's that planetary astronomy resumed a scientific advancement.  In the early part of that century, Nicholas Copernicus formulated a simpler description for the motion of the planets by assuming that they and Earth orbited the Sun in circular orbits.  His theory was not published until his death, mostly for concern over religious objections.  It was not until the first years of the next century that Johannes Kepler determined a more complete description of planetary motion, but this is a story to be told some other time...

The nature of the wandering stars was not revealed until the invention of the telescope in the early 1600's, and the first use of a telescope to observe the planets Jupiter and Saturn by Galileo in 1610.  Galileo was the first to see the planets as spheres very unlike stars, which under the highest levels of magnification always appear as points of light (due to their immense distance from Earth). 

The advancement of astronomy after Galileo was continual, with increasingly detailed catalogs of stars and other celestial objects being created throughout the later 1600's through the 1800's.  The telescope was dramatically improved after Newton invented an all-mirror telescope in 1668, and both the number of telescopes and their size and quality advanced rapidly in the 1700's.

Sir William Herschel was one of the early great telescopic observers, and manufactured over 400 telescopes of various sizes in his lifetime.  His largest was a 49" diameter Newtonian reflector, which rapidly proved impractical to use because of its stupendous size (over 40 feet in length). Herschel, assisted by his sister Caroline,  performed a grand survey of the heavens starting in the 1770's, building catalogs of double stars and nebulae that are still consulted today by amateurs and professional astronomers alike.

It was during his survey of double stars that on the night of March 13, 1781 that Herschel observed a pale white disk at a position not matching any known fixed star in the constellation Taurus.  During this period in the history of astronomy, with the steady improvement in telescopes, the discovery of comets months before they became bright objects in the night sky was becoming an exciting possibility.  Herschel was convinced that he had discovered such an object after returning the next night to the same area of the sky and confirming that the object he observed the previous night had moved slightly relative to the surrounding stars. 

After making several more careful observations of the pale disk, recording the exact motion of this body through the background of stars, it became possible to roughly estimate the orbit of the object and begin to predict its future motion.  Herschel worked out the preliminary orbit estimate, finding that newly discovered object was incredibly over 1.5 billion miles from the Sun - nearly twice the distance of Saturn, the farthest known planet in the Solar System.  To be at this immense distance, and yet easily observed by Herschel through even small telescopes, it was quickly understood that this object was far larger than any comet, and indeed much larger than the Earth. 

Herschel named the object Georgium Sidus (George's Star) after the reigning king of England, George the Third (the same king of early American history infamy).  Although this royal flattery did help Herschel become appointed the "King's Astronomer", the name was not well received outside England, where it was widely referred to as Herschel's Star.

However, it was not yet proven that Herschel's Star was a planet.  At its huge distance from Earth, the new object changed position in the sky so gradually that an exact orbit was very difficult to calculate, and the possibility of error was large.  The Russian mathematician Anders Lexell, a master of the field of mathematics now known as celestial mechanics, became interested in this problem, and worked for several months using the accumulation of observations being made throughout Europe.  Despite his efforts, he was unable to determine if the object was orbiting in a closed elliptical path, or in an open parabolic orbit typical of comets. 

Finally, Lexell referred back to previous sightings of an object of similar brightness made in back in 1759, and also not matching any known star position, by the astronomer Christian Mayer.  Conjecturing that these observations, made in the nearby constellation Pisces, were of the same object seen by Herschel in the constellation Taurus some 22 years later, Lexell recomputed the orbit, finding it to be a nearly circular ellipse, and confirming the object as a very massive planet.

Herschel went on to discover two large moons orbiting the new planet.  European astronomers debated the proper name for the new planet, suggesting both Neptune, to commemorate Britain's recent naval victories, and Uranus, the father of Saturn.  The element uranium, discovered in 1789, was named in support of this choice.  Uranus became the accepted name for Herschel's planet, though it was only in 1850 that the Royal Society of London officially abandoned the name Georgium Sidus.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.
William Desmond May 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm
I must say this has created quite a stir!
Luis Smart May 14, 2013 at 07:04 am
I agree Richard argyle sweaters would have really made it. It is really sad Michael Passero has goneRead More to the dark side and has aligned himself with the administration rather than the people of the city. The one time high vote getter will be all done in November.
Richard Cranium May 13, 2013 at 10:26 pm
I think it is pretty funny although they should be wearing argyle vest sweaters!